purebeast007 replied at 2014-10-6 02:23 static/image/common/back.gif
actually on S4 the highest person can 1 shot every wave we get to during the whole Ryoka btw.. just ...
lol... then maybe u all can nicely talk to him n maybe he will 1 shot lesser n let others have the kills.
no, no he can't purebeast, he stated earlier that he can one shot up to maybe wave 5 now. you are giving false information, and trolling everyone, you already got in trouble but refuse to learn
Spazmodia replied at 2014-10-7 15:16 static/image/common/back.gif
no, no he can't purebeast, he stated earlier that he can one shot up to maybe wave 5 now. you are gi ...
This is going to....can't believe I'm doing this but...oh god...
Purebeast is correct.
I know for a fact the S4 guy can one shot whatever they get to, as he's about as strong as me if not stronger (my mains stronger than his though) and I can one shot up to probably wave 40+, or whatever wave has about 18-20m hp.
We always get to wave 27-31 and I one shot those easily.
lol, I'm sorry if I'm wrong, but the guy he was talking about commented in this post, stating that he could one shot up to 5th wave. that may have changed since, but either way, one of my guildies is a vip0 and gets 4-8 ryoka kills each night, so his entire argument is invalid anyways.
Spazmodia replied at 2014-10-7 15:29 static/image/common/back.gif
lol, I'm sorry if I'm wrong, but the guy he was talking about commented in this post, stating that h ...
When he made that post about 5th wave, I believe that was a LONG time ago heh... But I agree with you, ppl on my server get plenty of kills to despite me one shotting everything.
[email protected] replied at 2014-10-8 00:30 static/image/common/back.gif
When he made that post about 5th wave, I believe that was a LONG time ago heh... But I agree with y ...
Usually we hit 26-29 wave till ruoka ended.
ON EU 21 we have the same "monster" who can actually oneshot all of them.
I don't count, but all others can snipe smthng like 15 ruokas .
115 ruokas to me and 15 ruokas to another 20-30 snipers. :D
Pretty cool.
I voted number 2
hanzo666
US10
BP 333899
[email protected] replied at 2014-10-29 19:56 static/image/common/back.gif
I voted number 2
hanzo666
US10
Can we not necro posts please. These threads were dead.
Edited by Shahadem at 2014-11-3 23:49
[email protected] replied at 2014-8-25 14:43 static/image/common/back.gif
Why make this poll? The strong (or rich) will always be on top...so it is in real life so shall it b ...
A game isn't real. All the systems are completely artificial and created by the game developers who could have created the systems to operate any way they pleased. Since they chose to make such clearly unfair systems when they could have chosen to make very fair systems then they must be horrible people.
And we must work in real life to make real life more fair as well. If you assume that everyone was given ownership of the same value of resources by nature, then we should try to restore the imbalance in the system that unfairly and unnecessarily pools too many resources at the top and too few resources at the bottom.
navisterva replied at 2014-8-26 02:09 static/image/common/back.gif
With this statement you proved my point, the rich shouldn't get richer is like saying he who invest ...
Actually you just negated your own point.
If everyone invests as much as they can, the person who gets the most is the person who was able to afford the most. But just because someone has more doesn't mean they deserve more. It just means they have more. Your argument is that the richer guy is richer because he is more worthy of having those riches. But that clearly isn't correct. He might just be richer because he was luckier, or because he cheated, or a million other reasons that having nothing to do with worth. And we don't want people to gain advantages they don't deserve. If the only reason why you earn more is because you had more money to invest, then you don't really deserve those greater profits more than someone who invested less simply because they could only afford to invest less.
For many people the entire point of playing a game is moving to a scenario where wealth disparity doesn't exist.