well ........ i go back to my Sado now ....
Soo. besides the actual hacking or non hacking can someone really say why Shikai ichigo only doing 20-30k dmg with 200-250k attack please? if a bug can please be fixed cause at least his fury move does 500-900k dmg.
I also have shikai ichigo and senbon and I've been having this same problem. My other vanguards still do normal damage. I also tried using hyorin and shikai ichigo still hits only like 20k if I'm lucky. His fury attack still does full damage though.
The Main question i could answer (the dmg part) The Reason is that Gogames tried to make an Over Powered like Really OP Vanguard that has Awsome defense and great dmg but for that to happen they had to reduce something and that was the basic attack dmg, they increased the hp, defence skill dmg etc but reduced the basic dmg cuz otherwise he would be to damn op.
The 2nd question i dont know shit bout cut i can say that the current user (i belive the so called "Hacker") is the real user and the so claimed "owner" is just some random dude that did not get what he wanted so he started flame this guy to get his acc, as he repededly says he have evidence why have no one said he has since he should have "PM":ed them, he is obviously a annoyed little kid trying to get what he wants by using the aggresive lie, to make ppl feel sorry for him and take his part in the battle of the acc, the "hacker" is the owner adn has always been, the "proclaimed owner" is the hacker/scammer. i know since i've seen over 100 cases of ppl doind the same as him and i've even tried it sometimes xD, Issues solved i hope
Edited by kannebankai at 2015-7-11 07:48
Don't tell me I missed all this drama :'(
And for the initial question of the topic I don't know if it's a bug or something like that but I realized during the battle report available during the event to show True Shikai Ichigo in fight that he deals almost nothing with his basic attack but his skill damage was just HUGE in comparison. Maybe they made him a "Exclusive skill damage dealer partner" ? It's just a supposition