Reio 2nd day Fury Stones
Hey,i'm planning to take those fury stones 2 hours later,what should i exactly do? Didn't get the 2nd part that says first top-up reaches 500 gold thing. Can i do 400,then 200 top up? Or should i go straight 800g top up?The 2nd thing is having to spend 500 gold. myungdae replied at 2015-8-13 16:39 static/image/common/back.gif
The 2nd thing is having to spend 500 gold.
Then i don't have to top up 800 yeah? 600 should be enough instead of topping up 600 tomorrow, top up 200 today and 200 after reset. save urself 5$ and get 200 extra gold with the bonus. BurakCinar replied at 2015-8-13 17:08 static/image/common/back.gif
instead of topping up 600 tomorrow, top up 200 today and 200 after reset. save urself 5$ and get 200 ...
Can i get dem fury stones that way? I need them for the true build of Tosen-san If u have 100 gold and u spend 200 you will get 200 + 200 because of the 1st stage cleared and that meand 500g. Then you have to spend 500 gold to complete the 2nd stage. }
That means that with just 5 usd you can get the 8 fury stones. Uciffer4 replied at 2015-8-13 17:40 static/image/common/back.gif
If u have 100 gold and u spend 200 you will get 200 + 200 because of the 1st stage cleared and that ...
how??.......... The first task is top up 200g and you get another 200g for free As i said, the 1st thing is to top up 200g. So you get 200 + 200 because thats what 1st box gives you (that means you now have 400g). To complete the second one you need to spend 500 gold, if u already had 100g since the begining, that means now you have 500 and you can make the 2nd box. After that you use the VIT option to make the 3rth one and then the 4th one (the spin thing). Uciffer4 replied at 2015-8-13 17:31 static/image/common/back.gif
As i said, the 1st thing is to top up 200g. So you get 200 + 200 because thats what 1st box gives yo ...
i know it always was to spend 500 gold for 2nd achievement and it used to say that in the past, but it says now for 2nd achievement to "Top Up 500" instead of spend...is that a new visual error or is it a new requirement? has anyone tried yet this time around to confirm?
Pages:
[1]
2