Zento-Hazashi Publish time 2015-8-29 20:09:16

purebeast007 replied at 2015-8-30 01:06 static/image/common/back.gif
i've defeated #4 #3 #2 #1 and Tosen, so far if you are that concerned about me beating the Hollow  ...
Ok you're not blind, you section of pieces off text/writing to you're own viewing

thus creating a biased viewpoint




So how about you read the first of the shit I/we said?

Not just "Oh crap they are talking about all the flaws with my idea, I'll counter it with how powerful my Nel is and how powerful i've become.... I'll also just state that they are wrong... whilst saying logic too!"

purebeast007 Publish time 2015-8-29 20:10:46

Edited by purebeast007 at 2015-8-29 20:13

Zento-Hazashi replied at 2015-8-29 20:09 static/image/common/back.gif
Ok you're not blind, you section of pieces off text/writing to you're own viewing

thus creating a  ...
i write back based on things that are needing responses, not to idiotic points that have no need for replies
and no i wasnt "countering back" with a stupid reply i was stating a fact... show me 1 player who has dodge in the assault line or the support line to a point where someone with actual good hit % will be able to miss... get my drift?.. see how stupid you sound now ur trying to pull a rabbit out of ur hat when u dont even got a hat...

Zento-Hazashi Publish time 2015-8-29 20:10:54

purebeast007 replied at 2015-8-30 01:07 static/image/common/back.gif
i've read everything, my initial post covers EVERYTHING you said... unless someone cant read, ther ...

Oh ok you're back to being blind again

1st part - The attack and who it attack (Growth rate and whatnot)

2nd part - The Buff/Debuff (The ability) Anything after this part can be more buffs, or more debuffs

Kisuke - His initial skill is to attack the enemy vanguard with a set amount of damage due to his growth rate indicated within the skill

His SECOND part (Which is a STILL part of the skill, but not CONNECTED with the first part at all) is his fury gain, to himself and allies.

That second part, is an ALWAYS, and is part of his whole skill, but not directly connected to the attack himself, as long as he pulls it off.

You did not read that else you wouldn't be using 'logical' terms, because this is a game, that's the 'logical' term, right in your face.

Zento-Hazashi Publish time 2015-8-29 20:11:53

purebeast007 replied at 2015-8-30 01:10 static/image/common/back.gif
i write back based on things that are needing responses, not to idiotic points that have no need f ...

then everything is idiotic to you, that's your profound 'logic'

Why? Because you're ignoring all points to you.

All the discussion is to be on here correct? go with it then.

purebeast007 Publish time 2015-8-29 20:13:54

you honestly have no case here, you are just like the other rats that try to think ur right when you have no clue...

sirnibbles Publish time 2015-8-29 20:14:51

purebeast007 replied at 2015-8-29 20:13 static/image/common/back.gif
you honestly have no case here, you are just like the other rats that try to think ur right when you ...

you are just like the other rats

cats*         

Zento-Hazashi Publish time 2015-8-29 20:16:13

purebeast007 replied at 2015-8-30 01:13 static/image/common/back.gif
you honestly have no case here, you are just like the other rats that try to think ur right when you ...

aight i think im done, i really do, what's your IQ? seriously i cant :lol

Anything with vital information AGAINST you, you deem 'useless', you deem is 'incorrect'. That's the most biased shit i've heard for someone to come out of a discussion to say "I've won, everyone else against me? Oh they lost!"

oh wait you probably won't read this either

but then again this is nothing to go against your main point in the argument is it, so you probably will read it.

Sh4rk3y Publish time 2015-8-29 20:16:27

purebeast007 replied at 2015-8-30 02:10 static/image/common/back.gif
i write back based on things that are needing responses, not to idiotic points that have no need fo ...

How dare we to have different opinions from yours!

Because this is literally your whole point.

purebeast007 Publish time 2015-8-29 20:17:38

Sh4rk3y replied at 2015-8-29 20:16 static/image/common/back.gif
How dare we to have different opinions from yours!

Because this is literally your whole point.
im all for opinions but dont mix up logic and idiocy... im done for tonight, ill respond tommorrow if need be to a post that is actually worth replying to... since im already lowering my self respect replying to some of these ones already

Zento-Hazashi Publish time 2015-8-29 20:17:47

Sh4rk3y replied at 2015-8-30 01:16 static/image/common/back.gif
How dare we to have different opinions from yours!

Because this is literally your whole point.

pretty much this
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
View full version: Logically should spells that apply buffs and debuffs work if the char misses?