um yeah i think its really over priced but cause its over powered and it shouldnt be available for everyone
boringstuff replied at 2014-10-1 19:50 static/image/common/back.gif
um yeah i think its really over priced but cause its over powered and it shouldnt be available for e ...
THen it shouldn't be available at all, till alte late game.
Remove fury stones from the game and give the people who paid for fury stone, agility and crit stones in return xD
Robenator replied at 2014-10-1 20:34 static/image/common/back.gif
Remove fury stones from the game and give the people who paid for fury stone, agility and crit stone ...
That would work to :p
I personally think they didn't consider their systems when they put in fury. No other stat can you hit or exceed 100%, except for fury. I think like most other stats it should be capped at 90%, thus eliminating turn 1 finishers that are uncounterable. I mean yes, with partner mods, or lucky extra rounds, your assaulter could skill on turn 1 but only after fury generators use skill on turn 1, which requires a degree of luck(or partner mods). This would also eliminate the stacking problem. If you have to stack Kisuke/Rukia and your main to get the right order and the chances to get skills off on turn 1 there's a chance that another player has an opportunity to at least have part of a turn.
I personally think fury stones have purpose, I like having 1 level 5 on each assaulter in pve incase rukia gets an extra round i have a chance to skill on turn 1 if she crits fury gen. I also like the idea of only enabling during PvE, however that does nerf it a bit harshly. Some would argue why PvE why not Rei events, which would mean arena/server clash, and I think thats everyone's concern.
All in all, I think the best way to handle it, is like crit, dodge, block and multiple other stats, cap at 90%. The higher players will be satisfied, no one will have 1 round fights unless something lucky happens, and it still has value.
Just my thoughts.
well if they spent that much for it then the reward should be just as = to the amount spent
catch what i mean
but i do agree that starting fury needs a cap limit
[email protected] replied at 2014-10-1 13:59 static/image/common/back.gif
Even fighting a strong BP player, if you got a respectable VG and line up you aren't going to die ...
you were beaten in arena o.O
aren't you like the best most awesome player on all the servers!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
KrisKingOfLegend replied at 2014-10-1 21:20 static/image/common/back.gif
you were beaten in arena o.O
aren't you like the best most awesome player on all the servers!!!!!!! ...
No I wasn't beaten, but I'm only maybe 3rd or 4th strongest Arena wise on all servers. But I know a few high BP players who've gotten crushed by low BP.
KrisKingOfLegend replied at 2014-10-1 21:18 static/image/common/back.gif
well if they spent that much for it then the reward should be just as = to the amount spent
catch ...
Yes, but in the relative manner or things they did not spend that much compared to a VIP 10. A 350k BP person should never beat someone who is 550k BP, 100% fury or not. That's called broken :p
Vaeric333 replied at 2014-10-1 21:12 static/image/common/back.gif
I personally think they didn't consider their systems when they put in fury. No other stat can you ...
If it's on plain luck that's fine, makes it a bit more interesting, but giving anyone a 100% free win card is absolutely terrible idea.