ibromvlieg Publish time 2015-1-1 15:28:57

which is a better assaulter?

kenpachi or ikaku?

lordsafak Publish time 2015-1-1 18:46:29

i think ikkaku more useful than kenpachi

zooboo222 Publish time 2015-1-1 19:20:28

ikkaku for events if you have enough fury boost for every turn atk.

nieverland Publish time 2015-1-1 19:36:42

Ikkaku at both pvp/pve becuase he also decrease fury, wich is more usefull that increase block at pvp and he recover fury wich is usefull at pve :P:

lmavenl Publish time 2015-1-1 20:13:47

Ikkaku is better because he is useful in PVP & PVE purposes unlike kenpachi who is pretty well more suited on PVE events.

KrisKingOfLegend Publish time 2015-1-1 20:17:54

You need them both but for PvP with the new 200% buff kenpachi is better

DeEmEn Publish time 2015-1-2 03:18:53

I like Ikaku better, I have them both, I tried them both in PvE and PvP.

PAOFUI Publish time 2015-1-2 04:36:38

KrisKingOfLegend replied at 2015-1-1 19:17 static/image/common/back.gif
You need them both but for PvP with the new 200% buff kenpachi is better


200% buff on Ken ? wat kinda of buff ?

tht arena buff ?

Brahmastra Publish time 2015-1-2 04:46:15

Kenpachi does more damage, Ikkaku has fury regen.
I'd go for Ikkaku.

KrisKingOfLegend Publish time 2015-1-2 08:00:09

PAOFUI replied at 2015-1-2 03:36 static/image/common/back.gif
200% buff on Ken ? wat kinda of buff ?

tht arena buff ?

I didn't separate well

the 200% HP buff



Kenpachi has a better skill -- more attack power

Ikkaku is good yes, but even with that fury buff its not that great, although the deducting fury of the enemy VG is good...
Pages: [1] 2
View full version: which is a better assaulter?