Alliance Blood Battle

[email protected]

ok, so heres my issue. im sick of being lvl 40 in a battle with lvl 60+. u guys need to fix this mess.  levels should fight levels, not all for one. its not fair. otherwise y even HAVE levels??????

PAOFUI

b4 the merge yes.... u ll hav problem finding ppl to join u... n also ppl to be in BB to fight....

unlike camps u onli need 2 ppl to kick start it...

but after the server theres plenty of ppl... even if u r at lvl100... i think thts not a big problem...

try to find someone or a team tht u can do it on a regular basis... unless u r 1 of those ppl tht the whole server doesnt like talkin to...

well i like the suggestion of havin 1 ppl can do camps... i would be laffin since many many weeks ago... n so does some player here

who is lvl 100 n cant do their bb until the server merges...

i belif they can go 1 vs 3 n still win it... xixixixi....

[email protected]

Yay! I'm not the only one peed off at Blood Alliance.  WTF? 1. You have a hard time getting a full team of 3 members unlike the Zanpukato Alliance.  Secondly, when you FINALLY get 3 players and you don't have the problem of being annihilated by everyone on the higher levels, there's on one to fight!!!! I've wasted at least 15mins waiting for 3 members, then another 20mins for someone to fight against! Total BS

Surely, there needs to be some kind of change to this.  Let us fight with just two players and if there's no one to fight, then compromise, we get half of the reward be default.

And stop those Effin 60Halls from crossing over :@:@:@:@:@ Bad enough with them winning everything else, at least give us something to encourage us to keep playing ... instead of throwing my laptop on the ground, stomping on it, then impaling it with a rake (don't have a sword or I'd use that)

[email protected]

Shahadem replied at 2014-11-4 00:07
No it wouldn't. The same problems would still exist. The only way to make GW work is to increase t ...

Yes it would, you can easily avoid the server monster that way, and still get points. You are wanting a way for weak players to win the whole thing, and that's not a good or wise thing to do, and it's pretty cheesy and cheap.

Shahadem

[email protected] replied at 2014-11-3 23:45
If there was 5 lanes all the time GW would be fine.

No it wouldn't. The same problems would still exist. The only way to make GW work is to increase the stats of a player each time they die so that the players who get instantly killed off at the start are the ones getting 10 kill streaks by the end.

[email protected]

Shahadem replied at 2014-11-3 23:39
The problem with Alliance War is small potatoes compared to the unfairness in Guild War. And the com ...

If there was 5 lanes all the time GW would be fine.

[email protected]

[email protected] replied at 2014-11-1 19:06
they need to put stuff at appropriate lvls, my son pays for this game an cant get any seretai reward ...

How is it not fair? Is this a troll post? Also you can't sell anything...

Shahadem

The problem with Alliance War is small potatoes compared to the unfairness in Guild War. And the complete pointlessness of the system.

dreaddreamer

Hi Kusuno , I just came here and updated my profile because I received an in-game prompt that the server is undergoing maintenance, possibly because of the adjustments of the time. Hopefully it will be fixed soon.

[email protected]

they need to put stuff at appropriate lvls, my son pays for this game an cant get any seretai rewards cause lvl 60+ r takin his spot an sellin the stuff. thats not fair as he has lvl 30 gear