- regtime
- 2016-6-18
- last login
- 2020-7-31
- readperm
- 30
- credits
- 1033
- digest
- 0
- posts
- 109
 
|
Devvoke2 replied at 2017-9-7 11:28 ![]()
randomness takes into account only the options no math really needed there
Ran a test just to prove a point. I rolled a digital dice (Random number generator) with 6 sides 3000 times.
I rolled
"1" - 527 times,
"2" - 493 times,
"3" - 475 times,
"4" - 486 times,
"5" - 492 times,
"6" - 527 times.
And the maximum deviation is ~10% between the lowest (475) and highest (527). If I were to keep doing this till 30 000 dice rolls the percentages would get smaller and smaller. Eventually you would hit ~0.1% deviation cause that's just how "randomness" works.
EDIT: The smaller the sample size is, the harder it is to tell the true deviation. |
|