Good Formation for lvl 90

tommymac009

I'm half way to lvl 90 and i was wondering which formation style is the best for Kido users. 1-2-2 or 1-3-1. I'm running a formation of 1-2-2 right now and it seems like my whole team is focusing on Kido attack rather then physical. I know that kido attack is strong because it goes against other players vanguard because players seem to lack kido def on their vanguard. Well im running formation of Sajin-Main Kido, Byakuya-Momo, Kisuke. Im about to get Kenpachi and unnohana at lvl 90 but kenpachi first but don't know whether to replace byakuya or momo.

OFF TOPIC but i would like to know which Title is better EAGLE EYE RAIDER (Kill 500 Ryoka) or SUPER DESTROYER (Damage 50000000 In Ryoka Event). I know triple crown is better then both but i doubt i would get that title anytime soon base on my situation.

lowkick1

Not at level 90 So I can't really help you there, tho focusing 1-3-1 will make things easier for pve events I think, since you will be working on 3 assaulter's gears instead of exchanging your vanguard's gear to an assaulter. You can also focus your wisdom stones to 3 ppl, instead of 4 if you had 1-2-2 formation, but in turn you will need to spread out your str stones to 3 ppl instead of 2.

For the title, eagle eye would seem better for pvp giving additional hit rate and break defense. The super destroyer is slightly better than eagle eye for pve events. I say slightly because 2% crit rate and 100 pts of atk isn't much, but you don't need the hit rate nor bd for events.

vio2k5

lowkick1 replied at 2014-10-9 02:26
Not at level 90 So I can't really help you there, tho focusing 1-3-1 will make things easier for pve ...

pve wise a 0-3-2 formation would be better. as for pvp it depends what you fight against on a daily basis and how much speed you have so you can get first attack or not. team wise, it looks like your putting a strong team together, i never really bothered with momo nor did i have trouble fighting against her. I am a little confused why you went for byakuya instead of ikkaku though

tommymac009

vio2k5 replied at 2014-10-9 08:19
pve wise a 0-3-2 formation would be better. as for pvp it depends what you fight against on a dail ...

I thought it would make me more powerful in PvP and it did. Im ranked 3 in Arena in my server with a VIP 4.
I was planning on making a formation of Unnohana-Kenpachi,Main Kido,Byakuya-Sajin for my PVP formation and Kisuke, Rukia-Kenpachi, Byakuya Main Kido but i might have to missed out on my sajin's equipment and might not have anything equip for Rukia during events.

lowkick1

vio2k5 replied at 2014-10-9 07:19
pve wise a 0-3-2 formation would be better. as for pvp it depends what you fight against on a dail ...

If you had read what I wrote I said 1-3-1 would make pve easier, as opposed to a 1-2-2 that this topic is about. Of course you are subbing that vanguard spot, but it switching it for a support rather than an assaulter would make the 0-3-2 formation less gimped since you have 3 assaulter's gears built instead of just using vanguard gear on an assault if you had the 1-2-2 formation.

yamivegeta

Anyone with Yoruichi will give your 1-3-1 formation a bad time. So stick to 1-2-2 for PvP Imo.

tommymac009

yamivegeta replied at 2014-10-9 15:19
Anyone with Yoruichi will give your 1-3-1 formation a bad time. So stick to 1-2-2 for PvP Imo.

Anyone with Momo you mean? It doesn't really matter if they have yoruichi because you can either beat me completely with the 10th skill or i will eleminate you. My speed is 45k so most players with yoruichi in my server wont even get to use their skill.

tommymac009

lowkick1 replied at 2014-10-9 14:40
If you had read what I wrote I said 1-3-1 would make pve easier, as opposed to a 1-2-2 that this t ...

Lol i read what you said. But my thought were on PVE and PVP. If i use 1-3-1 as my formation for PVP then how do i get thru with PVE 0-3-2. Since Subbing out my Vanguard and adding another supporter, then my vaguard stones would be useless and my support wouldnt have any damage in PVE.

lowkick1

tommymac009 replied at 2014-10-9 16:34
Lol i read what you said. But my thought were on PVE and PVP. If i use 1-3-1 as my formation for P ...

Ahh I see. Your point is valid, and after thinking about it, the synergy would be best with replacing vanguard to another assaulter, rather than having a poor dmg supporter if the player doesn't have resources to build a supporter for just pve.

reikoka

Personally I run 1-2-2 and find it far more effective then 1-3-1. Unohana plus either Yoruichi or Harribel works really good for pvp and works much better for pve since I just need to move my vanguards gear to a third assault for the 0-3-2 setup. Most of the exp you get is from the pve events so it doesn't really make it much easier to lvl a 1-3-1 setup then a 1-2-2 and your vanguards spirit stones should be strong enough to support an assault.
P.S: When I say it works much better i mean the setup, not Unohana or Harribel/Yoruichi. I swap those 2 out for Urahara and Rukia in pve.